Sarah Palin Calls Out the President on His Health Care Speech

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Before President Obama's address tonight on Health Care, I tweeted that I was wondering how many times he would refer to "death panels" or Governor Palin. I thought to myself that it was an unwise thing for the President of the United States to go down that road in this much-anticipated speech. However, his track record told me that he is much too partisan and much too focused on anything Sarah Palin says to avoid it.

I was right.

What stood out most to me was the manner in which he did it. Both his face and his voice changed noticeably as he did so. Although it's not her purpose to get under his skin, it is clear that she is.

President Obama might want to tackle a different approach. It really doesn't look good when the President of the United States keeps attacking a private citizen. Even Marc Lamont Hill, a strong Obama supporter who admitted to Bill O'Reilly that he's "more to the Left than most liberals," stated that it was unwise for the president to take "cheap shots at Sarah Palin" in his speech tonight. Watch the video clip from The Factor by clicking here.

Not only is it unwise, it doesn't accomplish what it's intended to: silence her. Sarah Palin is not going to be silenced on this issue. As he did tonight, the president can say she's lying, he can threaten to "call [her] out," and he can continue to send David Axelrod behind her to refute her words, but more and more Americans are realizing that she knows what she's talking about, and they want answers from President Obama.

She responded to his speech a few minutes ago on her Facebook page:

Response to the President's Health Care Speech
Today at 12:25am

After all the rhetoric is put aside, one principle ran through President Obama’s speech tonight: that increased government involvement in health care can solve its problems.

Many Americans fundamentally disagree with this idea. We know from long experience that the creation of a massive new bureaucracy will not provide us with “more stability and security,” but just the opposite. It's hard to believe the President when he says that this time he and his team of bureaucrats have finally figured out how to do things right if only we’ll take them at their word.

Our objections to the Democrats’ health care proposals are not mere “bickering” or “games.” They are not an attempt to “score short term political points.” And it’s hard to listen to the President lecture us not to use “scare tactics” when in the next breath he says that “more will die” if his proposals do not pass.

In his speech the President directly responded to concerns I’ve raised about unelected bureaucrats being given power to make decisions affecting life or death health care matters. He called these concerns “bogus,” “irresponsible,” and “a lie” -- so much for civility. After all the name-calling, though, what he did not do is respond to the arguments we’ve made, arguments even some of his own supporters have agreed have merit.

In fact, after promising to “make sure that no government bureaucrat .... gets between you and the health care you need,” the President repeated his call for an Independent Medicare Advisory Council -- an unelected, largely unaccountable group of bureaucrats charged with containing Medicare costs. He did not disavow his own statement that such a group, working outside of “normal political channels,” should guide decisions regarding that “huge driver of cost ... the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives....” He did not disavow the statements of his health care advisor, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, and continuing to pay his salary with taxpayer dollars proves a commitment to his beliefs. The President can keep making unsupported assertions, but until he directly responds to the arguments I’ve made, I’m going to call him out too.

It was heartening to hear the President finally recognize that tort reform is an important part of any solution. But this concession shouldn’t lead us to take our eye off the ball: the Democrats’ proposals will not reduce costs, and they will not deliver better health care. It’s this kind of “healthy skepticism of government” that truly reflects a “concern and regard for the plight of others.” We can’t wait to hear the details on that; we look forward to working with you on tort reform.

Finally, President Obama delivered an offhand applause line tonight about the cost of the War on Terror. As we approach the anniversary of the September 11th attacks and honor those who died that day and those who have died since in the War on Terror, in order to secure our freedoms, we need to remember their sacrifices and not demonize them as having had too high a price tag.

Remember, Mr. President, elected officials work for the people. Forcing a conclusion in order to claim a “victory” is not healthy for our country. We hear you say government isn’t always the answer; now hear us -- that’s what we’ve been saying all along.

- Sarah Palin

I am so glad we have a true public servant who will not back down on this most important issue.


Salixj September 10, 2009 at 4:33 AM  

The more I listen to Sarah Palin the more I like her, even when I disagree with her. She has class and substance.

Unfortunately, and I could be wrong, I don't think she'll make it far politically, except on the sidelines. That's okay too, sometimes the best thing a person can do is be on the sidelines and not have to worry about pleasing others and keeping it nice.

Adrienne Ross September 10, 2009 at 6:36 AM  


Thank you for your heart-felt comments.

It's interesting because the more I hear Sarah, the more I think she WILL make it far politically--if she chooses. I agree with you that she is not trying to please others. She just wants to do what's right and to make a difference.

theblackcommenter September 10, 2009 at 10:35 AM  

Wow. I'm really pleased to read this and Mrs. Palin continues to impress.

Sim September 24, 2009 at 3:20 AM  

if she was honestly more concerned about moving the country forward- and i mean solely that- then there was no need for her to respond to Obama's "call out" to her. she should have just kept on going with what she thinks was the right thing instead of deciding to sidetrack herself by defending an ego. a position is better shown through action than it is through mere unbinding speech; speech that is often times just bending the words of another politician, to fit the agenda of another politician, often times only in the interest of that certain politician... its quite redundant.

Although, perhaps i'm wrong and she knows what she's doing. I just tihnk it's a little unneccessary to create trouble for a guy who has enough problems trying to lead a country, instead of trying to do what she can to help him.

Post a Comment

  © Blogger template Noblarum by 2009

Back to TOP