Global Warming Game: You're Being Played

Friday, February 19, 2010

The global warming "experts" crack me up. Oh, wait; I forgot: it's climate change now, right? What I find funny is whenever Al Gore is supposed to have what they once called a global warming conference--before it became ridiculous to call it that--a snow storm hit! So in the midst of record snowfall and cold, the running joke among those of us who have not bought into the concept that man's activities are responsible for changes in climate is "So how about that global warming?!" That's the question I ask myself as I shovel my driveway!

Al Gore-types respond to such jokes by saying that the cold is a result of this global warming. Huh?! My best friend said it best when she said, "So when it's warm, it's because of global warming, and when it's snowy and cold... it's because of global warming?! Uh, you can't have it both ways!" Well, maybe you can--when you're running a game on people or when you're among those who have been played.

Governor Palin tackled the global warming hoax in her Facebook note early this morning.

“Global Warming” – More Like a Snow Job

Over the last few months, and even again today, very unsettling revelations have come to light about the “settled science” of man-made global warming. With all of these shoes dropping you’d think every member of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) would be barefoot by now.

One thing after another keeps popping up to further discredit the theory of man-made global warming. The IPCC’s supposedly definitive report proving the theory is riddled with serious errors. The organization has been publicly chastised by everyone from its former chair to the heads of the UK’s biggest funder of climate research and Greenpeace UK. One of the world’s top climate change scientists, Prof. Phil Jones, has conceded that there’s been no significant warming since 1995; that the medieval period may have been warmer than today; and that he’s had trouble even keeping track of raw data crucial to the global warming theory. Yet President Obama still seeks to create a federal office for global warming, and they’re still talking about mandating their cap-and-tax plan that's based on discredited data.

The Obama administration’s environmental extremism also shows up in its aversion to oil and gas development. A true all-of-the-above approach to energy would mean allowing oil and gas explorers to drill here and drill now because America has the proven reserves needed to meet our energy challenges. A new industry study reveals that the federal government's current restrictions on oil and gas drilling in Alaska and off the U.S. coastline will cost us $2.36 trillion through 2029. Think of the millions of U.S. jobs we could create, and how much more secure America would be, if we had a true free market approach to energy independence that allowed us to finally drill!

And though I applaud the President’s newly declared interest in nuclear power, it should be noted that he’s merely following through on loan guarantees authorized during the prior administration. What’s more, while the White House now touts the building of new nuclear power plants, its budget inexplicably calls for cutting funding to the proposed nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. A real nuclear energy plan requires a strategy for dealing with nuclear waste storage and recycling.

The man-made global warming hysteria isn’t based on sound science, and the Obama administration’s energy policy isn’t based on sound economics. If the climategate revelations teach us anything, it’s that we need to cool down the rhetoric and fire up our common sense.

- Sarah Palin

Click here to read this on the governor's Facebook page and find the links she included.


Post a Comment

  © Blogger template Noblarum by 2009

Back to TOP